Rabbi Elie Abadie, Co-Vice-President of JJAC, stands where the missing panel on Jews from Arab countries should have been
The UNESCO exhibit People, Book, Land: the Jewish people's 3, 500 year relationship to the Holy Land has finally opened in Paris after much controversy. But the exhibit has created a new controversy - by airbrushing out Jews from Arab lands. Lyn Julius blogs in the Times of Israel:
The UNESCO exhibit People, Book, Land: the Jewish people's 3, 500 year relationship to the Holy Land has finally opened in Paris after much controversy. But the exhibit has created a new controversy - by airbrushing out Jews from Arab lands. Lyn Julius blogs in the Times of Israel:
It was indeed a historic achievement – ‘ a
miracle’, as the Hebrew University professor and author Robert Wistrich,
who wrote the 24 panels tracing the
3, 500-year-old history of the
Jewish people in the Land, put it. The exhibit, two-and-a-half years in
the making, was a ‘political hot potato’, he said, wiping his brow. It
had been due to open in January 2014, but Arab pressure had forced its
postponement.
Not everyone is happy with the final result: the word ‘Israel’ does not feature in the title, and the Dead Sea Scrolls picture on the original advertising poster has been pulled.
But visiting members from the organisation Justice for Jews from Arab Countries (JJAC)
are hot under the collar about a different issue. They were shocked to
discover that the resettlement in Israel of Jews driven from Arab states
in the 1950s was missing from the exhibit. From two panels on the
Holocaust, the narrative skips this important chunk of history
altogether. The next panel deals with the rescue and resettlement of
Soviet Jewry.
When the JJAC delegates confronted the
exhibition architect Robert Wistrich with their grievance, he told them
that he had written an entire panel on the suffering and ingathering of
Jews from the Middle East and North Africa. This panel, together with
two others dealing with Israel’s wars, deemed too ‘political’, had been
pulled at the request of cagey UNESCO officials. One surmises that the
panel explaining why 600,000 Jews were forced to flee Arab lands for
Israel was withdrawn because it would have offended the sensibilities of
UNESCO’s Arab and Muslim members.
The next day, JJAC members asked the UNESCO
Director-General Irina Bokova why Jews from Arab countries were absent
from the exhibit. It was clear from her vague reply that her advisers
had kept her in the dark on this issue.
To compensate for the pulled panel, Wistrich,
whose wife is a Syrian Jew, had attempted to weave mentions of Jews from
Arab countries into the text of the remaining panels. One sentence
reads: “In 1968, Middle Eastern Jewry made up 48 percent of Israel’s
Jewish immigration.”
This was the only statistic in the entire
exhibit which disbelieving UNESCO officials had demanded that Wistrich
back up with a reference to its source, Israel’s Central Bureau of
Statistics.
Why had the leaders of the Simon Wiesenthal
Center not fought to maintain the missing panel? Seemingly, they
insisted in talks with UNESCO that the panel on Soviet Jewry be
retained.
Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the
Center, told JJAC members that there was no reason why the missing three
panels should not be restored to the exhibit when it goes on tour.
Nevertheless, omitting the story of Jewish
refugees granted a haven by the state of Israel represents a lost
opportunity to educate a non-Jewish audience in a prestige international
venue.
Speaking at the exhibit’s inauguration, Rabbi
Marvin Hier did not mince his words:” The purpose of the exhibition is
very clear,” he had declared: “to put an end to the canard that a Jewish
state came into being in 1948, not because Jews had any connection with
the land of Israel, but because the world took pity on them as a result
of the Holocaust.”
What a pity that Rabbi Hier did not assign
equal weight to scotching the canard that Israelis are colonialist
interlopers from Europe who had snatched Palestine from the native
Arabs. Here was a golden opportunity to affirm that Jews not only had a
3, 500- year continuous presence in the Land of Israel, but were the
original inhabitants in what is now known as the Arab world. Over 50
percent of the Jews are in Israel not because of the Nazis or the
Soviets, but because they were displaced by Arab and Muslim
antisemitism.
Once again, however, an Eurocentric view of
Israel’s history has won the day, and truth was sacrificed to political
correctness. In the eyes of the Jewish establishment and the
international community, the mass flight of Jews from Arab countries
remains, sadly, a taboo subject. Some ‘ hot potatoes’ are still too hot
to handle.
Read article in full
Crossposted at Harry's Place
and Jews Down Under
and in Polish translation
Read article in full
Crossposted at Harry's Place
and Jews Down Under
and in Polish translation
I am not surprised.
ReplyDeleteThe speech of Irina Bokova at least is very friendly.
ReplyDeleteThis and several articles on your trip at the CRIF website.
http://www.crif.org/
I am looking for a detailed description of the panels so as to evaluate the damage.
Is there a video?
This is the big downside of not resisting the names of "Mizrahi" or "Arab Jews" rather than "Sephardi". Spain, after all is in Europe.
But surely, they had at least a mention of the Jewish Moghrabi quarter in Jerusalem on one of the panels?
Thanks for the
ReplyDeleteThanks for the CRIF references, Sylvia.
No video. No detailed description of the panels.
All I can tell you is that there was a mention of Dona Gracia and the founding of Tiberias (although not of the Kabbalists of Safed), a panel devoted to 19th century Jews in Jerusalem and Montefiore's visits. Nothing about the modern exodus of Jews from Arab lands, as per the article.
I suggest you send this article or the relevant part to the CRIF as soon as possible because they don't seem to have noticed. The majority of French Jews are from Arab and Muslim countries from Algeria in particular.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteHaaretz puzzling response to charges of anti-Sephardi racism: “ Sugarcoating isn’t our thing”.
As Anshel Pfeiffer cynically explains,
"yes, some of the sentences and phrases they use could be regarded as offensive, racist or anti-Semitic were they to appear originally in an American or European publication. But they haven’t. They were written by citizens of the Jewish state mainly for Jewish readers. As Israelis we are free of those complexes – Israelis criticizing Jews for not living up to Jewish standards is something we are not only allowed to do here, but we have a duty to do. We’re not going to sugarcoat that when we translate it for you."
http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/jerusalem-babylon/.premium-1.598523
I guess, as per last week’s oped by Salman Masalha published in Haaretz English edition, that Ophir the airport security man isn’t living up to Jewish standards since
"his black color looked very shabby, tattered and stained with evil."
By the way, this fixation by hard-core racists and anti-Semites with their targets' hair color and texture is well known. Drumont, the father of French anti-Semitism, used to write about German Jews that their hair had the color of “fish glue” whatever that means.
Pfeiffer:"Haaretz publishes the Israeli Arab writer who, trying to bring home to his Israeli readers the dreary predictability of being racially profiled at Ben-Gurion airport, employs irony to turn the racial paradigm on its head and remind Israelis that they, too, can be profiled."
ReplyDeleteIrony? So that's what it was..
what masalha wrote was pretty horrible, but HaArets has long taken such attitudes. Feffer once wrote for Maqor Rishon but I am sure that the money is better at Haarets. Now he sounds like an opportunistic toady to his employers. It's called "journalist integrity" at Haarets.
ReplyDeleteIf Sylvia has time she could look up a comment by the saint of the Peace Movement, Gideon Levy. He wrote in June 2008 or 2009 [during the time of the Hebrew book fair where I picked up my free sample copies of Haarets] about a free concert given in Tel Aviv at about that time, I think at the Park haYarkon. He wrote that none of the tens of 1000s of folks at the concert were Mizrahim. Because they don't like classical music. He saw them all and he knew, all 30 or 40 thousand.
Anyhow, I may have clipped the article at the time but if so, I can't find it now. It would be useful if somebody would look up this article in the English edition and use it eventually as a part of a bill of indictment of haarets.
I am too busy to do the research.