Tuesday, November 09, 2010

Harassment at Jewish sites dates back to Ottomans

Rachel's tomb near Bethlehem

UNESCO's re-branding Rachel's tomb and the Cave of the Patriarchs as Muslim sites bodes ill for the preservation of Jewish shrines throughout the Middle East. The struggle to maintain Rachel's tomb as a Jewish site goes back to Ottoman times; at Ezekiel's tomb in Iraq, for instance, Jews also had to pay protection money and, in the face of harassment and extortion, bend the ear of a sympathetic Ottoman governor, or even the Sultan himself - in order to safeguard their rights of worship. Nadav Shagrai has written this JCPA essay:

For many centuries, Jews were compelled to pay protection money and ransom to the Arabs who lived in the area so they wouldn't harm Rachel's Tomb and the Jews who visited it. In 1796, Rabbi Moshe Yerushalmi, an Ashkenazi Jew from central Europe who immigrated to Israel, related that a non-Jew sits at Rachel's Tomb and collects money from Jews seeking to visit the site. Other sources attest to Jews who paid taxes, levies, and presented gifts to the Arab residents of the region.

Dr. Ludwig August Frankl of Vienna, a poet and author, related that the Sephardi community in Jerusalem was compelled to pay 5,000 piastres to an Arab from Bethlehem at the start of the nineteenth century for the right to visit Rachel's Tomb. Other testimonies relate that in order to prevent damage to Rachel's Tomb, payment was transferred to Bedouin members of the Taamra tribe who lived in the region, who had also begun to bury their dead near the tomb during that era. There is a Muslim cemetery on three sides of the compound that mainly belongs to the Taamra tribe and the entire attitude of the Muslims to Rachel's Tomb derives to a large extent from this tribe, which began burying its dead at the site during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries due to its proximity to Rachel's Tomb. The origins of the practice, as the Land of Israel researcher Eli Schiller writes, is the popular Muslim belief that "the closer that the deceased is buried to the tomb of a sainted personality, the greater will be his rewards in the world to come."

Taxes were also collected from the Sephardi Jewish community in Jerusalem to pay the authorities for various "rights," such as passage to the Western Wall, passage of funerals to the Mount of Olives, and for the protection of gravestones there, as well as payment to the Arabs of Bethlehem for safeguarding Rachel's Tomb.

One of the scribes who managed the accounts of the Sephardi Kolel during the eighteenth century reported on the protection money that the Jewish community at that time had to transfer to the "non-Jews and lords of the lands who are called toeffendis...(15,000) Turkish grush...and these are the people who patrol the ways of Jaffa Road, Kiryat Yearim, the people of the Rama, the site of Samuel the Prophet, the people of Nablus Road, the people of the Efrat Road, the tomb of our matriarch Rachel...so they would not come to grave-robbing, heaven forbid. And sometimes they complain to us that we have fallen behind on their routine payments and they come scrabbling on the gravestones in the dead of night, and they did their things in stealth because their home is there. Therefore, we are compelled against our will to propitiate them."

Rabbi David d'Beth Hillel, a resident of Vilna who visited Syria and the Land of Israel in 1824, testified about a Muslim cemetery in the region of Rachel's Tomb. "No person is living there, but there was a cemetery. On the opposite hill there is a village whose residents are Arabs and they are most evil. A stranger who comes to visit Rachel's Tomb is robbed by them."

In 1856, fifteen years after Montefiore had built another room to Rachel's Tomb, James Finn, the British consul who served in Palestine during the days of Turkish rule, spoke about the payments that the Jews were forced to pay to Muslim extortionists at some holy places including Rachel's Tomb: "300 lira per annum to the effendi whose house is adjacent to the site of crying" (the Western Wall) for the right to pray there and "100 lira a year to the Taamra Arabs for not wrecking Rachel's Tomb near Bethlehem."


In 1841 Moses Montefiore obtained a license from the Turkish authorities to refurbish Rachel's Tomb and add another room to it, which changed its appearance and improved its formerly neglected status. A door to the domed room was installed and keys were given to two Jewish caretakers, one Sephardi and the other Ashkenazi. Fourteen years previously, an official of the Sephardi Kolelim (religious study centers) in Jerusalem, Avraham Behar Avraham, laid the groundwork for Montefiore's activity at Rachel's Tomb when he obtained recognition from the Turkish authorities for the status and rights of Jews at the site. This was, in practice, the original firman (royal decree) issued by the Ottoman authorities in Turkey recognizing Jewish rights at Rachel's Tomb.

The firman was necessary since the Muslims disputed ownership by the Jews of Rachel's Tomb and even tried by brute force to prevent Jewish visits to the site. From time to time Jews were robbed or beaten by Arab residents of the vicinity, and even the protection money that was paid did not always prevail. Avraham Behar Avraham approached the authorities in Istanbul on this matter and in 1830 the Turks issued the firman that gave legal force to Rachel's Tomb being recognized as a Jewish holy site. Additionally, the governor of Damascus sent a written order to the Mufti of Jerusalem to fulfill the Sultan's order.

This is our order to you: (the following matter) was submitted to us by the subject of our order, the sage representative of honored Jerusalem's Jewry and his translator that the tomb of esteemed Rachel, the mother of our Lord Joseph...they (the Jews) are accustomed to visit it from ancient days; and no one is permitted to prevent them or oppose them (from doing) this....It turned out that at this holy site, they have been visiting since ancient times, without any person preventing them or trespassing on their property and they (have it) as was their custom. In accordance with the respected judgment, I order that our commandment be issued to you so you will treat them accordingly without addition or without subtraction, without hindrance and without opposition to them by anyone in any way whatsoever - written August 10, 1830.



An additional firman from April 1831, eight months later, determined inter alia:

To inform and demonstrate to all interested parties and the appointed officials, the right of the Jews who are residents of holy Jerusalem to visit the grave of Rachel, the mother of the Prophet Joseph, peace be upon him, without hindrance....The deputy translator and other public functionaries, members of the Jewish community of Jerusalem, approached me with many requests regarding the tomb of Rachel, may peace be upon her, the mother of the Prophet Joseph, peace be upon him, and it is known that this grave is located outside the city of Jerusalem opposite the town of Bethlehem, on the highway...and that since ancient times the Jews have tended to visit this holy grave without anybody preventing them from doing so, as an inviolable law. And now people have emerged who have begun to hinder them, although as aforesaid and as proven the Jews have a right to visit the grave according to the Sultan's order. Hence I approach his honor the governor, may he be exalted, reminding him of the contents of the existing order. I also order him to attempt to remove the obstacles from the Jews, residents of Holy Jerusalem and others, so they can visit the aforementioned holy grave unhindered. Rendered in Istanbul at the end of the month of Shawwal in the year 1246 to the Hejira.

Signed: The Sublime Porte.


Ironically, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, whose government has been described as "neo-Ottoman" in outlook, told the Saudi paper al-Wattan (March 7, 2010) that the Cave of the Patriarchs and Rachel's Tomb "were not and never will be Jewish sites, but Islamic sites."

Read article in full

10 comments:

  1. As far as I know, the ones harassing the Jews at the tomb and charging a fee to Jews were Muslim Arabs of the Ta`amra tribe, not the local Christians who had enough trouble with the Muslims of their own.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is the picture on the front for Mariam (ع)?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Tsion
    First of all in Jewish shrines, sites and cemeteries in Muslim lands the caretakers always are Muslims, both for religious and security reasons.
    In cemeteries for example, the caretaker gets a free house on the premises, and can make a lot of money depending on whether Jews are allowed to visit that country or not. Where they are, the caretaker charges not for entrance but for refurbishing and washing the grave or "re-inking" the markings, and selling candles. He usually knows how to play on people's sentiments (I know this from personal experience) and is handled by Jews like an etrog. The veiled threat is always present.

    Just an example of what kind of a prima dona a Muslim cemetery caretaker in Muslim lands can be: My next door neighbour here went with a group on a tour of Morocco. They were taken to a cemetery and she went along carrying with great care a handmade artfully ciseled box that she had just bought as souvenir. The caretaker saw that box and he liked it. Believe it or not, despite her protests, the other Jews forced her to give it to him.

    On the other hand, in places where the house falls into decay and nobody visits or keeps up the premises, the caretaker simply leaves and after a while all that is left are scattered pieces of gravestones, vandalized graves, scattered bones or sometimes just a hole where the grave used to be.

    So it is not necessary to use extortion, but apprently those living next to Rachel's Tomb became too greedy.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sylvia, the diary of James Finn, the Brit consul in Jerusalem in the mid-19th century, writes much about Qever Rahel and how members of the Ta`amra tribe extorted money from Jewish visitors to the site. Finn worked to help the Jews get unharassed access to the site, also with Montefiore as I recall.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes, Tzion, I realize that. What I am saying is that in Muslim countries, it is a tradition and a necessity to pay up willingly and chose the caretakers carefully if we want those sites to survive. And that today's state of the old cemeteries are a striking example of that.
    If I am not mistaken, the same Muslim family
    has maintained the Sephardic cemetery on the Mount of Olives for genrations.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Fascinating comment, Sylvia. I suppose the Chrstians also employed Muslim caretakers for their shrines - The Nusseibehs looked after the Church of the Holy Sepulchre for centuries, didn't they?

    ReplyDelete
  7. The Ottoman sultan gave the key to the Holy Sepulcher to an Arab family, I suppose the Nusseibehs, because the Christians could not agree on the rights of the various churches within that church.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm sure there is also a symbolism in having a Muslim caretaker for these holy sites, it stands for Muslim supremacy over the dhimmi.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Active synagogues in stable countries are often guarded by Muslims since Jews cannot bear arms. That makes sense. That's perhaps the reason.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Strange as it may seem, in the early Ottoman period, the sultans and the central govt sometimes tried to protect Jews and Jewish holy sites against the depredations of local Muslims. Here are two blog posts on the subject:

    http://ziontruth.blogspot.com/2005/09/improvements-in-jews-status-in-ottoman.html

    http://ziontruth.blogspot.com/2005/09/sultan-temporarily-thwarts-effort-to.html

    ReplyDelete