Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Tangled web of Jewish ownership in 'Arab' areas

The stench of hypocrisy is rising from the current furore surrounding US objections to the redevelopment by a Jewish owner of the Shepherd hotel - once itself owned by the pro-Nazi Mufti Haj Amin al-Husseini - in the 'Arab' Sheikh Jarrah district of Jerusalem.
Jewish construction is seen as an obstacle to peace; burgeoning Arab construction in Jerusalem (much of it illegal) is not. You only have to read Justus Reid Weiner's research exposing the construction boom in thousands of Arab units in Jerusalem, much of it lavishly funded by Saudi Arabia, the Gulf states and the Palestinian Authority, to understand that peace is not the issue. On the contrary, over the last several years, the Arabs have been engaged in a political and demographic race for control of Jerusalem.
To the US government and the European Union, everything is black-and-white: in their eyes west Jerusalem is 'Jewish', and east Jerusalem, where Israeli sovereignty is not recognised under international law, remains 'Arab'. In truth, this simplistic view ignores the fact that the eastern part of Jerusalem only became Jew-free when the thousands of Jewish inhabitants were 'ethnically cleansed' from the old city in 1948, scores of synagogues destroyed and cemeteries desecrated during 19 years of Jordanian occupation. The city was reunited when the eastern side of the city was recaptured and annexed in 1967 by Israel.
The issue of land ownership in Jerusalem is far more complex than the Obama administration and the EU would have us believe. Mount Scopus - the original site of the Hebrew university campus and the Hadassah hospital - remained a Jewish enclave in Jordanian-controlled territory. It is also a little known fact that hundreds of thousands of Arab squatters in 'Arab east Jerusalem' live on land still owned by the Jewish National Fund. The JNF purchased hundreds of individual parcels of land in and around Jerusalem during the 1920s, 1930s and 1940s. Some ended up under Jordanian control. In 1948, on one of these parcels the UN built the Kalandia refugee camp, seizing the land without permission from the owners, the JNF. As Gil Zohar explained in his 2007 Jerusalem Post piece other parcels of land in 'Arab' east Jerusalem were cut off from their Iraqi and Iranian Jewish owners after they came under Jordanian rule. In total 145,976 dunams* of Jewish land is said to have come under Jordanian control. ((Jewish property claims against Arab countries by Michael Fischbach, p 85).
Another 16,684.421 dunams of Jewish land in the rural West Bank - including the Gush Etzion settlements, land between Nablus, Jenin and Tulkarm, and in Bethlehem and Hebron - were seized by the Jordanians after 1948.
The Golan Heights are almost universally considered 'Syrian' territory and yet the JNF lays claim to 73,974 dunams in southern Syria (op cit, p36). The earliest purchase was made in the 1880s.
On the macro-level, it is estimated that Jews living in Arab countries owned some 100,000 sq km of deeded property, equivalent to four or five times the size of Israel. Many cities in the 'Arab' Middle East and North Africa had large Jewish populations. Baghdad was a quarter Jewish. When over 90 per cent of Iraq's Jews left for Israel in 1950 - 51, property seized by the Iraqi government included three hospitals, 19 Jewish schools, 31 synagogues and two cemeteries.
In Egypt mansions belonging to wealthy Jewish families became embassies, residences and public institutions. Jihan Sadat still lives in a mansion once owned by the Castro family, and president Mubarak reputedly has the use of a villa owned by the Smouha family.
The international community gets into a huff when Jerusalem property once owned by Arabs is legally bought by Jews. Across the Arab world, Jewish property has been abandoned, sequestered or sold well below market value as Jews left in haste or were driven out. The West is sanctioning the principle that the Arab world must be Jew-free (Arab states have almost succeeded in this task, having banished 97 percent of their Jewish population) . The takeover of millions of dollars' worth of Jewish homes, shops, offices and communal property by Arabs has never been considered provocative or an 'obstacle to peace'.
Double standard, anyone?
* 1 dunam= 1,000 sq. metres
Update (with thanks Lily) : the irony that the Shepherd hotel in Jerusalem should have been owned by a man committed to making the Middle East Judenrein has not been lost on Avigdor Lieberman who has ordered a photo of al-Husseini meeting Hitler to be disseminated by the Israeli foreign ministry.
Crossposted at Melanie Phillips' blog and at Israpundit
The US - Israeli building dispute over Jerusalem
Jews owned land in the West Bank and Gaza (leaked Palestine Paper)
BBC ignores Jewish claims in Abu Dis

7 comments:

  1. The plot of real estate in question, formerly owned by Haj Amin el-Husseini, British-appointed mufti of Jerusalem and Nazi/Holocaust collaborator, is located about 100 meters from the Shim`on haTsadiq quarter. This quarter or neighborhood is adjacent to the presumed Tomb of Simon the Just [Shim`on haTsadiq]. The tomb and surrounding real estate were purchased by the Ashkenazi and Sefardi communities of Jerusalem circa 1890 in a joint enterprise. Small homes were built on the Jewish-owned plot for poor Jews. Ironically, the Arabs in the adjoining Shaykh Jarrah neighborhood were the wealthy, such as the Nashashibi family that owned a multi-story luxury [for that time] apartment building across the street [Mount Scopus Road, דרך הר הצופים ] from Shim`on haTsadiq. As said, the property owned by the Mufti Husseini was just down the street, about 100 meters from Shim`on haTsadiq and the Nashashibi building.

    The Arab propagandist historian, George Antonius, lived in that same area in a home that he rented from the Mufti and that was called Karm al-Mufti [the mufti's vineyard]. I don't believe that Antonius' former home is part of the plot of land subject to US State Dept and British Foreign Office demands. However, I am not sure exactly where Karm al-Mufti was. Maybe it was part of the plot in question.

    Anyhow, the Jews living in Shim`on haTsadiq were subject to attacks by Arab irregulars in December 1947 and all of them fled near the end of the month. All fled but one family that stayed into January 1948. This last remaining family fled between the 8th and 10th of January. Hence, the Jews of Shim`on haTsadiq were the first group that fled its homes during the War of Independence and could not go home after the war, whereas Jews who had fled south Tel Aviv in December 1947 could go home after the war.

    In other words, the first refugees in that war were Jews, contrary to conventional false claims made today.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sounds like you are conflating land ownership with state sovereignty.

    A Canadian may own property in Ft. Lauderdale. That doesn't make his condo Canadian territory.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Fair point and I am not an expert, but the sovereignty is disputed in all these areas.

    That doesn't stop the press talking about 'Arab' east Jerusalem - meaning that a majority of the area is owned and lived in by Arabs - and 'Palestinian land' in the West Bank when there has never been a Palestinian state.

    The ownership issue is complicated by the fact that the JNF has a quasi-government status and'acts on behalf of the Jewish people'.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Steve, the fact is that all of the land west of the Jordan, as well as land east of the Jordan River, not demarcated until 1925, was part of the Jewish National Home juridically erected by the international community in 1920 at the San Remo Conference, endorsed by the League of Nations in 1922, confirmed by Article 80 of the UN charter circa 1945, and left unchanged by the General Assembly partition plan recommendation of 11-29-1947. In short, all the land west of the Jordan, including Jerusalem obviously, belongs to the Jewish National Home [Israel recognized Jordanian sovereignty east of the Jordan in the Israel-Jordan peace treaty of 1995].

    So Jewish sovereignty over Jerusalem was recognized as far back as 1920. Further, Jews have been the majority of the population in Jerusalem at least since 1853, according to the contemporary French historian Cesar Famin and the Britisher Bartlett. It is generally agreed by knowledgeable historians, even some Arabs, that Jews were the majority in the Holy City in the 2nd half of the 19th century. In 1853, the Old City was the whole city.

    Further, the Old City --on the east side of the city-- was under Jordanian occupation from 1948 to 1967. Jews were forbidden to live or even to pass through the kingdom of Jordan by the kingdom's racist laws. Jewish holy places were out of bounds to Jews during the Jordanian occupation. The "Palestinian Authority" has anti-Jewish laws similar to those of Jordan.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for elucidating, Eliyahu

    ReplyDelete
  6. The Law of Return is for The Jews, the option to return to Greater Israel and The Arab-Palestinians to leave Greater Israel and return to the Arab countries they originated from. The Arab-Palestinians should move to the Million plus Jewish homes confiscated by the Arab countries from the expelled Jewish people and the 120,440 sq. km. of Real property the Arabs confiscated from the million plus Jews and their children expelled from Arab countries. That is the only viable alternative.
    Face it and stop hallucinating, once and for all. There will never be an Arab-Palestinian State in Greater Israel West of the Jordan River (Judea and Samaria). Jerusalem the United Eternal Capital of the Jewish people.
    YJ Draiman

    ReplyDelete
  7. Background on
    Arab Palestine Nazism:

    * March 1933, the mufti is already rushing to the German consul to offer the Nazis support.

    * 'Falastin', April 4, 1933, expressed appreciation for Nazi leader Adolf Hitler vs Arab Palestinian leaders. 

    * 'Falastin', May 1933, calls Hitler "noble", justifies his persecution of the Jews.

     * El Karmel, [Karmil] May 14, 1933 : "Will an Arab Hitler appear among us to awaken, unite and lead us to lead us to fight and defend our rights?" 

     * [Ad Difa'a] Al-Difa had glorified Nazis, published translated excerpts from Hitler's Mein Kampf's book. al-Shanti, called on Arab youth (in an article from June 1, 1934) to "learn from Hitler's actions and imitate them."

    * March 15, 1935, The Templars' 'Die Warte des Tempels' wrote: many Arabs see Hitler as the most important man of the 20th century and almost every Arab knows his name. Fascism and National Socialism with its anti-Jewish attitude are accepted positively by many Arabs. 

     * May-June 1935, Arabs in Haifa found Nazi club 'Red Moon.' In May: As Arab delegates returned from Haifa Arab youth conference - Swastika drawn on train beneath it, inscription: 'Germany above all,' In Arabic.

    * June 25, 1935, Al Difa'a reported that "uniformed and Nazified" Arab youth troops are being formed in Palestine.' 

     * 'Falastin'', January 5, 1936: "It is very easy to explain our youth's sympathy for the fascist idea."

    * 1936-8: "Nazi flags and pictures of Hitler were prominently displayed in store windows. Booklets explaining Nazi methods of forcing Jews from the Reich were distributed freely... The shout of 'Heil Hitler' became a catchword which rang insolently over all Palestine." (Ziff, 'The Rape of Palestine', 1938). 

    * 1936-9, Hilda Wilson, a teacher at Birzeit throughout the revolt, noted that most of her students were pro-Nazi and approved of Hitler.

     * NYT May 1937, 'All' of Palestine celebrated Muhamnad's birthday with flying Nazi swastika and pictures of Hitler. 

     * 1937, Walter Doehle, German consul in Jerusalem: "Palestinian Arabs in all social strata have great sympathies for the new Germany and its Führer…" 

     * Awni Abd al-Hadi (Istiqlal & AHC) in Jan 1937 to Nazi magazine : 'Arabs Like Nazis.' 

    * 'Falastin', Sep 1938, reacting to Hitler's speech, describes dictatorship as against [sic] Jewish so-called control.

    * In 1938, some 100 Arabs, including from Palestine, represented in Nuremberg.

     * Journalist John Gunther in 1939: "The greatest contemporary Arab hero is — Adolf Hitler." 

     * Ahmad Shukeiri's testimony in his (1969) book that they (all) sympathized with the Nazis referring to (1940-1). 

     * Sakakini's Feb. 1941 poll - 88% of Arab-Palestine favoring the Axis. 

     * Dr. Zaid Hamzeh (was 9 yrs old in 1941): "We Arabs supported Hitler during WWII because he hated the Jews," recalled in a 2019 interview.

    * Per Edward Said, pro-Nazi Mufti al-Huseini represented (1946) the consensus of Palestine Arabs. The Mufti worked with the Nazis 1941-1945: Rachid Ali coup and Farhud pogrom; hate radio; SS Muslim units; Barid al-Sharq; Jul-1943 Krakow Antisemitism Conf.; preventing children from being rescued to Palestine; concentration camps visits; Atlas Op., etc.

     * CIA August 1942 report: "majority of the Arabs in Palestine Palestinian Arabs are fiercely 'anti-Jewish'… the radicals, who form a majority, see in the approach of Rommel an ideal opportunity to murder all Jews their seize their property." 

    * In 1942, reaction of most Arabs in Palestine upon hearing the fate of the Jews in Europe, was: 'open joy.'

     * Dec 21, 1942 letter, representatives of the Reich and the NSDAP in Palestine described the Arabs' hope for a great Arab state: "Arabs in Palestine were waiting for Hitler to come to Palestine and expel all the Jews." 

    ReplyDelete