Tuesday, January 23, 2018

Al Jazeera: Jewish archive triggered trauma - among Iraqis!

By now, most readers of this blog will have heard of the Iraqi-Jewish archive, found in the waterlogged basement of the Iraqi secret police headquarters and shipped to the US for restoration. (The US is slated to return it to Iraq next September.) It is only when you get to the very last sentence of this Al-Jazeera piece that the trauma experienced by Jews from Iraq, resulting in their 'ethnic cleansing,' is hinted at. The only Israelis interviewed here by Dalia Hakuta are post-Zionist academics or radical leftists. The overwhelming impression that the archive is the property of Iraq, and that it is the Americans who have stolen it from their rightful  owners. Nowhere in this mendacious piece is it explained that the archive is comprised of  books and documents seized and stolen from Jewish homes, synagogues and communal offices by the Iraqi regime in the 1960s and 70s. My comments in italics are interspersed in the text. (With thanks: Dan)

Baltimore, United States - A group of men and women celebrate a young man's bar mitzvah, the Jewish rite of passage when boys turn 13, as a rabbi wraps "tefillin" - black leather straps used during prayer - around the boy's arm.
The crowd of revellers is both Jewish and Iraqi and the celebration was not uncommon: this was Baghdad in 1963.
The black-and-white photograph is part of a treasure trove of ancient pieces of Judaica retrieved from the headquarters of Saddam Hussein's General Intelligence Service during the United States' 2003 invasion of Iraq
The heirlooms include documents dating from the mid-16th century to the 1970s and more than 2,700 books in Hebrew, Arabic and Judeo-Arabic, a version of Arabic written in Hebrew letters and spoken by Iraqi Jews.

They cast invaluable insight on Iraq's ancient Jewish community, which dwindled from an estimated 130,000 people to fewer than five today.

But the rich collection is not without its share of controversy as Iraqis have criticised the delay in repatriating the archives to Baghdad and accused the US of benefitting from the spoils of the occupation of their country.

"The general sentiment is that the Americans took documents that belong to the Iraqis," said Orit Bashkin, a University of Chicago historian and author of Impossible Exodus: Iraqi Jews in Israel.

"And that's also connected in the Iraqi memory of the destruction of libraries and ancient collections that occurred during the US invasion and occupation of Iraq."

So the painful memories triggered by the archive are not Jewish memories of persecution by Saddam's regime resulting in their exile, but the trauma that ordinary Iraqis endured when (Iraqi) looters stole artefacts from museums and libraries during the occupation of Iraq by the US!

The collection - crate loads of rabbis' sermons, school textbooks, and university applications that were waterlogged, muddied or stained - was discovered in a basement that had flooded when the Americans bombed a building in Baghdad 15 years ago.
However, some items were spared because the missile failed to explode.

Following an agreement with the provisional Iraqi government, the US' post-war viceroy, the rare collection was sent to the National Archives and Records Administration in the state of Maryland to be restored.

For a decade, the artefacts underwent an arduous $3m restoration process. Preserved, catalogued and digitised, some pieces were put on display in a touring exhibit that has gone across the US.

At the exhibit's last stop at the Jewish Museum of Maryland this month, visitors could see "tiks" (cases for Torah scrolls) shaped like minaret towers, a testament to Iraq's architecture ('Oriental' architecture might be a more appropriate term - as the tiks predate Iraq, a modern invention); a Hebrew Bible from 1568; and a Haggadah (Passover guide), hand-written and decorated by an Iraqi youth.
Washington had assured the Iraqis the archive would be repatriated after the restoration process was done. But after pushing back the return date several times, the relics are still here.

US officials now say they are slated to be sent back in September 2018.

The question of whether and how Iraq will care for and preserve the archive, were it to return, is not even asked.

The personal pictures and letters found in the archive paint a vivid picture of a well-integrated community whose members held prominent positions in government and commerce and excelled in the world of arts.

By the 1960s, no Jews held  such positions.

Hit songs such as Foug el-Nakhal by Iraqi-Jewish composers Saleh and Daoud al-Kuwaiti remain popular across the Arab world. Sassoon Eskell, a legislator, minister and financier, is still remembered fondly as one of the architects of modern-day Iraq.

In 1910, records show Jews living in Baghdad made up one-quarter of the city's overall population.

By 1949, Iraq's Jewish population totalled about 130,000 people, mostly living in Baghdad, but also in Basra and Mosul. (and Diwaniyya, Hillah, Sandur, Shamiyya, etc)

Many documents capture snippets of their communal life: a letter details the allocation of sheep during Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year, while another asks the community's patriarch to persuade a man to grant his wife a "Get" (religious divorce).

"The archive talks about public life ... and most of the period it covers is the interwar period [between the two world wars] and the 1950s and 60s of Iraqi Jews who didn't migrate to Israel and lived in Iraq," said Bashkin.
"And you see the degree of Arabisation of the Iraqi Jewish community," she told Al Jazeera.

"It shows you that you could be an Iraqi and a Jew and that there's not an inherent contradiction there, and it shows you can be an Arab Jew."

And what happened to these Jews? Bashkin does not say - No matter how Arabised, they were executed, imprisoned or driven to escape.

But in the US, legislators and Jewish and Zionist groups say the archive should be conserved in a more stable environment where the descendants of Iraqi Jews can access them. Some groups have been lobbying to keep the collection from being repatriated to Baghdad.

In 2014, the Senate passed a unanimous resolution urging the Obama administration to come to a different agreement with Iraqi officials.
Charles Schumer, the Senate minority leader, asked the Department of State in October 2017 not to send the archive back and instead find a location that's more accessible to Iraqi Jews and their descendants.

Groups such as the Zionist Organization of America have made similar arguments, as have members of the Israeli parliament who have been pushing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to pressure the US to back out of its commitment to Iraqi authorities.

"It's pretty clear that a lot of artefacts didn't reach the West in a very ethical way," said Assaf Shalev, an Israeli-American journalist whose paternal family hails from Baghdad.

Huh? the Iraqi-Jewish archive was shipped out after an official, transparent agreement was signed. The manner in which they reached the Baghdad secret police HQ was, on the other hand, highly unethical.

"It's very clear that the US holding on to it would activate [the] sensitiveness around Third World countries getting their cultural heritage stolen," he said, adding he saw the other side of the repatriation debate as well.

 Shalev thinks the archive belongs to Iraq as its national heritage. Or does he?

"If this collection goes to Iraq, Iraqi Jews won't have access to it for the most part. I'm not sure where I fall exactly. I see merits in both arguments," Shalev said.

Shalev is a tad confused. 

When Israel was established in 1948, it began to push for Iraqi Jews to immigrate to the newly established state.

In 1950 and 1951, about 90 percent of the Jewish population left Iraq with most families moving to Israel, US-based historian Michael Fischbach estimates.
Many in the community faced discrimination once they arrived in Israel, however, and they were not given proper work or education opportunities, said Yael Ben Yefet, director of HaKeshet HaDemocratit HaMizrahit (the Democratic Mizrahi Rainbow), a social justice coalition of Middle Eastern Jews in Israel.

Naturally the persecution and discrimination Jews suffered in Iraq pales into insignificance, compared to what they endured in Israel...not

Ben Yefet said most of the Iraqis in Israel today would be unable to see the archive if it remains in the US because of "the educational and social-economic status of Iraqi Jews", which has declined from one generation to the next.

What  utter nonsense. Iraqi Jews are one of the most successfully integrated of ethnic groups in Israel. 

"On a personal level, and if I want my mother to be able to see [the archive], I'd like it to come to Israel or to a place where Iraqi Jews can have access to it," she said.
At last. Someone has said something sensible!

A recent idea has been to permanently house the archive in Iraq, but allow it to tour museums that are accessible to Jewish communities worldwide.
That's a proposal that Ben Yefet said she supports.

In the meantime, Bashkin said the collection remains close to the hearts of many Iraqi Jewish families, for whom it also raises painful memories.

Those include the Farhud - a 1941 pogrom that claimed the lives of 180 members of the community and ended in mass looting of their property - and the killing of 40 Iraqi Jews in 1968 when the Baath party came to power.

At last, Bashkin has admitted that Jews also have unpleasant memories of Iraq. 

"These traumatic memories are often projected onto the archive," Bashkin said.
"They know they can't go back to Iraq and they do want access to it. And this genuine sentiment is being politicised and tied to the question of who represents world Jewry."

Bashkin reduces the issue to a political tug-of-war between Israel and the Jewish diaspora, when it is the Iraqis who are claiming what was never theirs to start with who are politicising the issue.

Read article in full

HonestReporting post


by Davsil said...

Bataween, its obvious that you and (I would imagine) many of your other readers are upset with this article. But this is al jazeera. Are you really surprised by its content? Why should you purposefully make yourself upset and post articles like this?

bataween said...

You are right, but I know Jews who actually did not see anything wrong with the article. So it is still worth 'fisking'.

Sylvia said...

This should have been handled quietly behind the scene. Now that the Arab public opinion and the Jewish leftitude got hold of it and are discussing it, there will be only more pressure to send it to Iraq. But I imagine the Americans will insist on the question of availability to all researchers, which is something the Iraqis won't be able or willing to deliver.

Eliyahu m'Tsiyon said...

Why can't Iraqi Jews in the USA take this matter to court by suing the US Govt or the State Dept to show cause why the archive should not be kept in the US or given to Iraqi Jews?
The basic argument would be that these artifacts were originally stolen by successive Iraqi govts from Iraqi Jews and that the Iraqi govt now should make restitution by foregoing return to Iraq and askng that the items be given to Iraqi Jews.

michelle k. gross said...

author Orit Bashkin photo on https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe37g2jroEV-uTxvJCR61qm1iZ2D9N0u8pIjADAxp5J09H0Pw/viewform

michelle k. gross said...

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/C9FPQQ7t86kqARVa2xWL-DIDNaz9Js32xQ3KAtxTrx1ydyBZPNC4p3_p4gDQP2-L12wMrOldCA=w254 image