Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Returning archive is rewarding larceny

Harold Rhode, a Jewish expert in Baghdad during the US administration in 2003,  examining an item from the archive

One day in 1984, the Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein sent his henchmen to a Baghdad synagogue to seize what became known as the ‘Jewish archive’. Lyn Julius explains in the current issue of the Jewish Chronicle why returning the archive is rewarding larceny.

 The trove, retrieved from Jewish homes, schools and libraries, had been deposited for safe keeping in the ladies’ gallery. The few remaining Jews were aghast to see trucks full of documents and books driven away from under their noses.

In 2003 the US military discovered the archive under three feet of water on the floor of Saddam’s secret police headquarters. They decided to ship the ‘Jewish archive’  out to the US for restoration. The US signed an agreement with the Iraqi authorities, promising that the archive would be returned as soon as the work was complete.

The archive was taken to Texas and vacuum-freeze-dried. The US State Department has since spent over $3 million stabilising, digitising, and packing it.

Among the key items are a 400-year-old Hebrew Bible; a 200-year-old Talmud from Vienna; the book of Numbers in Hebrew published in Jerusalem in 1972; a Megillat Esther; a Haggadah edited by the chief rabbi of Baghdad; Ketuvim and Chronicles published in Venice in 1568; Pirkei Avot, published in Livorno, Italy in 1928; thousands of books printed in Vienna, Livorno, Jerusalem, Izmir, and Vilna; communal records; lists of male Jewish residents, school and financial records, university applications. This archive does not have great rarity value, but is a unique record of Jewish history.

The World Organisation of Jews from Iraq has gained permission from the Iraqis to bury unusable or pasool fragments of Torah scrolls in the US.

Although the federal government shut-down has postponed the opening, the National Archives in Washington DC was due to put the Jewish archive's highlights on display today; in January the exhibition will travel to New York. In June 2014, when the digitising process is complete, the archive will go back to Iraq, which considers the archive "part of its history and identity.”

But resistance is building to the transfer.

It is a bitter irony that Iraq, which has persecuted, abused and driven its pre-Islamic Jewish community to extinction, should demand the archive’s return. To send the archive to Iraq would be to return stolen property to those who stole it.

Executive director of Justice for Jews from Arab Countries Stan Urman argues that the US agreement  to return the archive to Iraq was signed ‘on a false premise.’

The archive is the cultural property of the 2,500-year old Iraqi-Jewish community, and save for six Jews still in Baghdad, that community no longer lives in Iraq, but in Israel and the West.

 If the archive was such a precious part of the national heritage, it would have been proudly displayed in the National Archives Museum in Baghdad, and not languishing on the floor of the secret police headquarters. One cynic has suggested  that  once in Iraqi hands, items from the archive would be sold off to the highest bidder.

There are practical objections to return, too. Iraq  does not have the resources to conserve the archive safely. Its treasures in the National Museum of Baghdad were looted in 2003; the country can scarcely safeguard life, let alone property. Hardly a day goes by without factional murder and bombs going off.

Furthermore, Iraq’s Jews and their descendants, 90 percent of whom are in Israel, say that they will be debarred from access to the original documents, even if these are digitised.

Private items should be restored to their owners, some of whom are still alive. Communal property should go to the Babylonian Heritage Centre in Israel.

The issue of the archive not only draws attention to the mass spoliation of nearly a million Jews driven from the Arab world, but is a unique opportunity to restore Jewish property to its rightful owners.

Read article in full

The petition asking the US government to stop the archive returning to Iraq is here.

1 comment:

Eliyahu m'Tsiyon said...

one of those Iraqi Jews who could not go back was Elie Kedourie. Here at the link he tells of his encounter with a notorious and powerful British Arabist, Sir
Hamilton Gibb.