Sunday, July 15, 2012

High time Israel "played the refugee card"








Last month, the UN marked World Refugee Day, a star-studded awareness campaign in which millions took part. Yet mention of one group of refugees was absent: the 870,000 Jews expelled from Arab countries since 1948. "Their history," said Israel's UN envoy Ron Prosor (pictured right), "remains one of the 20th century's greatest untold stories". Lyn Julius in the Jewish Chronicle* explains why their story should be told:

Almost exactly 45 years ago, Gina Bublil (above left) joined their ranks. She narrowly escaped rioting mobs and death at the hands of a driver who, instead of taking her family to the airport, tried to burn them alive inside a bus during the brutal 1967 expulsion of Libya's remaining Jews. Her family's warehouse was burnt down and their assets confiscated. All because she was a Jew.

In March, the pursuit of justice for Jewish refugees like Gina became official Israeli government policy, thanks to a campaign by the deputy foreign minister, Danny Ayalon, himself the son of an Algerian-Jewish refugee.

Around half of Israel's Jews descend from refugees from Arab and Muslim lands. Another 200,000 found sanctuary in the West. Few have received compensation. Arab governments have never admitted committing mass violations of Jewish human and civil rights, much less apologised or offered restitution. Yet, while more than 120 UN resolutions deal with the 711,000 Palestinian refugees, not one refers to the greater number of Jewish refugees. Until the Ayalon initiative, the Israeli government was mealy-mouthed in raising the issue, for fear that the Arabs would raise the Palestinian refugee issue. Israel's neglect has led to a major distortion in the way the conflict is understood.

Matters began to change in 2010: the Knesset quietly passed a law stipulating that Israel would not sign a peace deal without securing compensation for Jewish refugees. Israeli embassies around the world have been instructed to promote Jewish refugee rights. Ayalon has proposed a national memorial day for them. Last week, a draft bill making compulsory the perpetuation of the memory of these pre-Islamic Jewish communities was submitted for approval.

Ayalon's initiative breaks new ground, by placing blame for the creation of two sets of refugees - Jewish and Palestinian - at the door of the Arab League. In 1947, Arab League states drafted a plan to persecute their Jewish citizens; their rejection of the UN Partition plan and declaration of war on Israel resulted in the Palestinian exodus. Ayalon's ministry recommends that a global compensation fund be established to compensate both sets of refugees.

Why raise the issue when no Jew sees himself as a refugee today? They are full citizens of Israel and the West. The politics of Israeli Jews from Arab lands tend to be hawkish, coloured by the open wound of their trauma. Justice for Jews is a matter of human rights. Appreciation of mutual suffering can help achieve reconciliation.

Equally, the successful absorption of Jewish refugees provides a template for the resettlement of Arab refugees in Palestine and Arab states. Except in Jordan, Palestinians are denied the right to citizenship, and in many cases, jobs and property. The Jewish refugee issue also contextualises the Palestinian "right of return".

Borders can be agreed, Jerusalem can be divided, but the Palestinians will never abandon their goal of turning Israel into an Arab-majority state by flooding it with millions of refugees. Return of the Jewish refugees to unsafe and inhospitable lands, on the other hand, is unthinkable.

In May, US senator Mark Kirk won an amendment to a bill requiring the agency that cares for Palestinian refugees, UNWRA, to distinguish between genuine refugees and their five million descendants. Stripped back of bogus claimants, it becomes clear that an irreversible exchange of roughly equal refugee populations took place.

The Jewish refugee issue is evidence that Jews are not colonial interlopers, but an indigenous people deserving of self-determination. Moreover, they are crucial to understanding the Arab and Muslim world's religious and cultural resistance to the idea of a Jewish state. For 14 centuries Jews lived under Muslim rule as dhimmis - inferior subjects with few rights and little security.

Lastly, the persecution of other non-Arab and non-Muslim minorities - bound to intensify with Islamist election wins - shows that Israel is not the cause of the displacement of the region's Jews, but a necessary haven of stability and security in a sea of dysfunction, cruelty and chaos.

Read article in full

* The headline is not the writer's own but was chosen by the JC. It has upset PoNR readers, who see it as insulting, malicious and even antisemitic. Please write to letters@thejc.com to tell them what you think.

The Middle East's greatest story never told

9 comments:

sylvia said...

"playing the refugee card"? Is that what it is all about?
How about just justice for the suffering and the humiliation inflicted for centuries down to the last minute?
I think the title is indecent and an insult to all those who want justice and still chose to go elsewhere.

This is what you call shooting yourself in the foot.

bataween said...

That was the JC subeditor's headline, not the author's

Eliyahu m'Tsiyon said...

agree with Sylvia

Sylvia said...

"That was the JC subeditor's headline, not the author's"

That was a malicious, mocking and insulting headline. She should tell him off and go post elsewhere.

Or she should write back to mention the reactions here to his visceral tribalism.

A journal I won't read again.

bataween said...

Sylvia and Eliahu
I think the best solution is for readers like yourselves to write to letters@thejc.com voicing your sentiments.

Eliyahu m'Tsiyon said...

It's a crass statement and is insulting to the refugees themselves and to the government, implying that the government is crass.

bataween said...

It implies the government is engaged in some kind of cynical game

Sylvia said...

Bottom line: even in an article on the Jewish refugees, the Jewish refugees from Arab land are "made invisible" and treated with contempt, as puppets of the Israeli government regardless of their political views, and as such, their situation is viewed by radicals as "suspicious".

This is one of the reasons why I have in the past repeatedly warned against seeking government support -- although I am fully aware that without it we wouldn't have gotten that far. Lyn Julius should play down the official role: always stress that we have raised awareness DESPITE, not because, government interference. In fact, mentioning the plight of Jewish refugees from Arabo-Muslim lands was against government policies. I have already mentioned on this site the role of some early Zionist historiographers in trying to present a distorted history of "bliss" in accordance with government policy.

Compare this treatment to other titles on Jewish refugees (Ashkenazi) on the same site, and you'll see respect, accuracy, straightforward titles.

Why? This blatant antagonism is something pervasive in the US as well. Their clerics are the problem. There is also the fact that Anglo Jews, although under-represented in Israel - see themselves as the navel of yiddishkeit and the only legitimate Jews.

True, American Jews provided us as kids with powdered milk and salted butter in the schools in our former countries. And we are forever grateful. This, however doesn't justify the abuse we're taking day in day out.

bataween said...

The Jewish refugees are indeed invisible at the Jewish Museum in London which this summer celebrates all sorts of Refugees except Jews!
http://www.jewishmuseum.org.uk/World_City