Sunday, June 26, 2011

The Dhimmi roots of the Arab-Israeli conflict



Israel represents the liberation of Jews from 14 centuries of Islamic repression. Tragically, few western libertarians see it that way, says Lyn Julius in The Propagandist:

(Above) Abraham Foxman (right) Benjamin Netanyahu

Six little words. That’s all it will take to end the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. So said Benjamin Netanyahu last week, on the eve of yet another Quartet meeting to kickstart the Israeli-Palestinian diplomatic process.

Those words are: “I will accept the Jewish state.”

We’ve been hearing these six little words lately – but never from the lips of a Palestinian leader. In early June Nabil Sha’ath told an Arabic newspaper that the Palestinians will never recognise a Jewish state – only a state of Jews, Muslims and Christians in Israel.

Until Netanyahu decided to make a stand on Israel ‘s acceptance ‘as a Jewish state’, Israeli negotiators assumed that if Arabs accepted the ‘two-state solution’ they automatically accept Israel as a Jewish state. They do not. Having obtained UN approval in September to achieve their independent state of Palestine on the West Bank and Gaza, the Palestinians will move on to their next target : achieving their ‘right of return’ to Israel proper - a surefire euphemism for turning Israel into an Arab-majority state.

The refusal to utter those six little words points to the Arab rejectionism at the heart of the conflict. As Netanyahu states, ‘The issue is not over what Israel calls itself, but rather over what it is’.

Netanyahu’s appeal echoes that of Abraham Foxman, national director of the influential Anti-Defamation League. Foxman has also called for Arab leaders to utter those six little words. But Foxman goes further. He puts his finger on the nub of the conflict between Muslims and the Jews of Israel. The root of Arab/Muslim rejectionism lies in Dhimmitude.

"It speaks to the long history of relations between Jews and Muslims through the centuries, a relationship that in many ways was better than that of Jews living under Christians in Europe, but was still characterized by a consistent Muslim belief in Jewish inferiority and second-class status", Abraham Foxman wrote in the Huffington Post.” Israel, if it stands for anything in the Arab mind, is an assertion of Jewish equality. This is difficult for Arabs and Muslims to swallow under any circumstances, but particularly so because that assertion is being made in the heartland of the Arab world.”

The Muslim denial of collective minority rights is rooted in the historical rejection of non-Muslim peoplehood. Dhimmitude, a term coined by the historian Bat Ye'or, describes the Islamic practice of denying equality to Jews and Christians who live under Muslim rule. Islam offers them religious autonomy, not national freedom. The orthodox Palestinian line has been to deny Israel's existence, but to offer to allow Jews, after Israel's demise, to live in a "secular and democratic" Palestinian state. Implicit even in the Saudi peace initiative, hailed by many Israelis as a moderate and reasonable blueprint, is the notion that, in return for ‘normalisation’ ,the Jews of Israel must agree to submit to the traditional cultural and political dominance of the Arabs.

For 14 centuries, Jews, whose presence predated Islam in the Middle East and North Africa by up to one thousand years, lived in an atmosphere of ‘cordial hatred’ alongside Muslims. It is debatable whether Jews ‘had it better’ under Muslims than Christians; that, according to the acclaimed historian Bernard Lewis, is another myth. ’Despised but indispensable’ Jews were spared conversion to Islam because they could be exploited for their essential skills – as international traders, usurers and craftsmen.

But Jews had few rights under Islamic tutelage. They surrendered their right to self-defence to Muslims, paying ‘protection money’ - the jizya poll tax - in order to guarantee their physical safety. They had to submit to ritual humiliations reminding them of their cursed and lowly status – they had to wear special clothing, could not build their homes higher than the Muslim, could not bear witness against a Muslim in court. These rules were mostly abrogated following pressure from the European colonial powers in the 19th century, but, following the rise of 20th century Arab nationalism and now Islamism, indigenous (non-Arabs and) non-Muslims are once again being denied their rights. The Assyrian Christians, the Kurds and the Copts, experienced – and still experience - vicious persecution. But only one group – the Jews - who once numbered almost a million before 1948 - have been ‘ethnically cleansed’ from the region.

Jews from Arab countries escaped the gallows of Iraq, the torture of Egyptian prisons, violence and political and economic strangulation, to seek refuge in Israel and the West. They and their descendants now form almost half the Jewish population of Israel. Israel unshackled them from their traditional subjugation to Islam. Overcoming social discrimination in Israel’s early years, Middle Eastern and North African Jews are free and full Israeli citizens, able to live their lives in dignity and security, and able to defend themselves and their state.

But the Jews are one of the few non-Muslim peoples to have achieved self-determination. A nation of former slaves has committed the unforgiveable sin of overturning the natural order: Israel has repeatedly defeated the Arab Muslims on the battlefield. For the humiliated to now humiliate their traditional oppressors is unbearable.

To quote Albert Memmi, the great Tunisian-Jewish writer : “The Arabs in the past merely tolerated the existence of Jewish minorities, no more. They have not yet recovered from the shock of seeing their former underlings raise up their heads, attempting even to gain their national independence! They know of only one rejoinder: off with their heads! “

It is a tragedy that western libertarians do not see the self-determination of a small, indigenous Middle Eastern people – the Jews – as a progressive cause. Instead they support the Palestinian campaign against Israel – deceptively cloaked in the language of human rights. In so doing, they have become unwitting agents for the re-establishment of Arab and Muslim supremacy over a ‘dhimmi’ people. The Palestinians have skillfully cultivated their ‘underdog’ image. In reality, however, they are backed by hundreds of millions of Arabs and Muslims, enormous political clout and vast financial resources. The Palestinian cause was always a pan-Arab cause. Now, with Hamas and Hezbollah in the ascendant and the backing of the Islamic republic of Iran, it is an Islamist cause.

The West routinely ignores or minimises the plight of other small and powerless non-Muslim and non-Arab peoples who share the Middle East with their Arab and Muslim neighbours. There are twice as many Copts as Palestinians, but where are the protests against violations of their human rights? There are three times as many Kurds as Palestinians, but where are the calls for their cultural and political rights?

The turmoil of the ‘Arab Spring’ has begun to cast a long-overdue searchlight on the grubby repressive politics of Arab regimes. Perhaps greater freedom will result for both non-Muslims and Muslims. But we need a sea change in the way that the West views political rights in the Middle East belonging, as of right, to Arab Muslims. Israel has been misrepresented as an outpost of western colonialism. In reality, it represents the national liberation of the Jews, one of the most ancient of native Middle Eastern peoples.


Read post in full

Crossposted at Cif Watch

3 comments:

aparatchik said...

"one of the most ancient of native Middle Eastern peoples"

Is there an older people still in existence?

bataween said...

The Assyrians are pretty old too, and the Copts descend from the ancient Egyptians

Eliyahu m'Tsiyon said...

and Kurds --who are mentioned in Xenophon's Anabasis [if I make no mistake]